ArcaNuova · Education · Late understanding

The teacher I never liked

Sometimes, looking back, school sounds like one long imposition: getting up too early, sitting too long, memorising too much, understanding too little.

And yes, some of it was exactly that.

But perhaps not all teachers were bad. Perhaps at the time we simply did not yet know what all that isolated knowledge would one day be good for.

At school one often receives individual parts: dates, shapes, colours, grammar, perspective, formulas, rules, lines, angles, stories. At first everything lies around like screws, wall plugs and pieces of wood on a building site where no one has yet shown the plan.

No wonder one becomes dissatisfied.

Isolated knowledge without context rarely makes anyone happy. It feels like work without a purpose. Only later does one notice: some things first had to be learned separately so that one day they could connect.

Connections are not recognised because one wants them.
They are recognised when enough details lie in the mind.

There were teachers who could convey that. My art teacher was one of them.

He did not empty anything out. He filled something. Not loudly, not intrusively, not with grand theatre. He conveyed structure. Measure. Proportion. Harmony. The quiet imposition that a line must be right before it can be beautiful.

At the time I did not know what I would ever need that for.

Today it appears again. In a house. In a room. In a website. In a logo. In an Ark that should not merely float somehow, but must also look right.

And suddenly one notices: some teachers do not teach for the next exam. Some place something inside you that becomes visible only decades later.

Of course there were also the others.

Teachers who taught less than they performed themselves. People standing at the front apparently believing that the blackboard was a stage and the pupils were the audience for their unresolved personality issues.

I did not like one of them at all.

Not his manner.

Not his attitude.

Not the feeling that it was less about us than about himself.

Back then it annoyed me.

Today I see it differently.

Not more mildly.

Only more clearly.

I learned from him too. Not how I wanted to be. But how I never wanted to become.

Bad teachers were role models as well. Only with the sign reversed. They showed what happens when authority becomes more important than mediation. When someone uses their position to appear larger instead of allowing others to grow.

A good teacher shows a path.
A bad teacher shows a boundary.
And sometimes one needs both.

Perhaps school was not simply good or bad. Perhaps it was a storeroom full of individual parts: some rusty, some crooked, some valuable, some entirely incomprehensible at the time.

But years later one suddenly stands before one’s own project, takes an old tool from that inner storeroom and thinks:

Ah.

So that is what it was for.

Perhaps that is real education. Not only what one understands immediately. But what later prevents one from becoming arbitrary.

Back to the thinking room

Black dog with a thoughtful look
Who is thinking behind it?

ArcaNuova is not a finished product, but an ark for thoughts that can be taken along, grasped, understood and reused. What stands here should not merely be read. It should trigger something: an impulse, a tool, a beginning.

Behind ArcaNuova are experience, observation and the attempt to think about things clearly and practically. No psychological fog. No empty chatter. Something you can actually get hold of.

Thoughts

The author of ArcaNuova by the sea
Who writes behind it?

His path led from dental technician to dentist and from dentist to philosopher. He carried forward fewer titles than tools: precise observation, careful case history, diagnosis and the willingness to discard an initial assumption when reality does not fit it.

The thoughts do not come from a textbook, but from experience: in a dental practice, a solar installation, a router, an olive harvest or occasionally in the gaze of a dog.

More about the author

Thoughts

Festival of lights. Humanly conceived, technically illuminated.
How does he write?

As a dentist, I was used to well-trained office staff revising my medical texts. They corrected spelling, smoothed formulations and made complicated sentences readable. Nobody would therefore have credited them with the medical ideas.

Retirement ended not only the practice but also the office. Apparently only a president can take the entire staff into retirement. For linguistic revision I therefore switched to artificial intelligence.

The division of labour remained essentially the same: I provide thoughts, experiences and attitude; AI helps with sentence structure, spelling and polish. The new office assistant simply needs no desk, no holidays and shows a remarkable enthusiasm for syntax.

The birth round of my seal

Thoughts

Breaking wave in the Blue Lagoon
Why does he write?

The author has a pronounced curiosity and a tendency to follow thoughts long after others have changed the subject. Not everyone wants to discuss society, technology, philosophy or life’s absurdities over coffee. That is probably sensible.

In writing, every thought finds the space it needs, and every reader can decide how far to follow it.

Thoughts